Leticia Collins v. McLean County Jail

United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, Peoria Division · December 9, 2025 · No. 4:25-cv-01465-MMM

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois dismissed Leticia Collins’s pro se complaint without prejudice after screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court found that the allegations were too vague and nonspecific to identify claims against particular defendants and also explained the requirements for joining claims and defendants. The court granted Collins 21 days to file an amended complaint.

Holdings

  1. The complaint failed to state a claim because its allegations were too vague and nonspecific to place any defendant on notice of a specific claim involving a particular time, occurrence, or injury.
  2. A prisoner may join multiple defendants only when the claims against them arise from the same transaction, occurrence, or series of related transactions or occurrences; unrelated claims against unrelated defendants may not be combined in one complaint.
  3. The complaint was dismissed without prejudice, and plaintiff was granted 21 days to file an amended complaint that identifies what happened, when it happened, who was involved, how each defendant was involved, and what harm she suffered.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the complaint stated a claim for relief under the pleading and screening standards applicable to a prisoner civil-rights action.
  2. Whether the complaint improperly joined unrelated claims and defendants in violation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 18 and 20.
  3. Whether plaintiff could receive leave to amend and what requirements would govern any amended complaint.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (11)

  • Turley v. Rednour, 729 F.3d 645, 649 (7th Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Alexander v. United States, 721 F.3d 418, 422 (7th Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 609 (7th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Ross Brothers Const. Co., Inc. v. International Steel Services, Inc., 283 F.3d 867, 872 (7th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Davis v. Ruby Foods, Inc., 269 F.3d 818, 820 (7th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Mitchell v. Kallas, 895 F.3d 492, 502–03 (7th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Wheeler v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., 689 F.3d 680, 683 (7th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Owens v. Godinez, 860 F.3d 434, 436 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…