Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois granted Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a favorable Social Security disability determination and an award of $142,952.00 in past-due benefits. The court approved fees of $35,738.00, representing 25% of the past-due benefits, and ordered counsel to refund $13,869.79 in previously received EAJA fees.
Holdings
- The requested $35,738.00 fee was permissible because it equaled, but did not exceed, 25 percent of Plaintiff's past-due benefits, and it was reasonable under the circumstances.
- Counsel was required to refund the $13,869.79 in EAJA fees previously received because § 406(b) prevents recovery exceeding 25 percent of past-due benefits and requires the attorney to refund the EAJA amount.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff's counsel's requested fee of $35,738.00 under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) was within the statutory maximum and reasonable.
- Whether counsel was required to refund the previously awarded EAJA fees.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Arnold v. O'Malley, 106 F.4th 595, 601 (7th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796, 807-08 (2002)(followed)
- Strong v. O'Malley, No. 4:21-cv-54, 2024 WL 3935530, at *2 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 23, 2024)(followed)
- Plummer v. O'Malley, No. 1:23-cv-85, 2024 WL 4880436, at *2 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 22, 2024)(followed)
- Wattles v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 2:10-cv-2108, 2012 WL 169967, at *1 (C.D. Ill. Jan. 18, 2012)(followed)
- Polli v. Berryhill, No. 17-cv-1102, 2019 WL 10248978 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 27, 2019)(followed)
- Summer v. Kijakazi, 2:20-cv-483 (N.D. Ind. July 18, 2023)(followed)
- Narug v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 2:19-cv-490, 2022 WL 3714743 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 29, 2022)(followed)
- Loar v. Saul, No. 3:18-cv-775-TLS, 2020 WL 3302990, at *1 (N.D. Ind. June 18, 2020)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…