Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois conducted merit review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of Steven D. Lisle Jr.'s pro se § 1983 complaint concerning alleged denial of gender-affirming medical care in prison. The court allowed an Eighth Amendment claim to proceed against several medical and mental-health defendants, dismissed claims against certain administrators, and directed that unrelated claims be pursued separately. The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction and addressed service, pleading, discovery, and other case-management matters.
Holdings
- The complaint adequately stated an Eighth Amendment claim against Dr. Paul, Dr. Alford, Melvin Hinton, Dr. Puga, the Doe defendants, Nikki Rambo, Dr. Zariff, Hamilton, and Ginger Davis based on alleged denial of necessary treatment for gender dysphoria.
- The claims against Hughes and Nurse were dismissed because the allegations did not sufficiently show that either high-level administrator failed to address Lisle's medical needs.
- The unrelated claims concerning the medical writ for arm care, the strip-search demand, and the prison identification card were not permitted to proceed in this lawsuit and had to be pursued in a separate action.
- The motion for preliminary injunction was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint stated a legally sufficient Eighth Amendment claim against the medical and mental-health defendants for denying necessary treatment for gender dysphoria.
- Whether the complaint stated a claim against IDOC Director Hughes and Warden Nurse based on their alleged knowledge of and response to Lisle's complaints.
- Whether unrelated claims concerning a medical writ for arm care, a strip-search demand, and destruction or reissuance of a prison identification card could proceed in this action.
- Whether Lisle was entitled to a preliminary injunction requiring transgender treatment and specified housing, identification, restraint, staffing, and observation or search conditions.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (11)
- Turley v. Rednour, 729 F.3d 645, 649 (7th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Alexander v. United States, 721 F.3d 418, 422 (7th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Mitchell v. Kallas, 895 F.3d 492, 498–99 (7th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Burks v. Raemisch, 555 F.3d 592, 595 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Bostic v. Murray, ---F.4th---, No. 23-1665, 2025 WL 3248684, at *6 (7th Cir. Nov. 21, 2025)(followed)
- Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968, 972 (1997)(followed)
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008)(followed)
- Foodcomm International v. Barry, 328 F.3d 300, 303 (7th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Incredible Technologies, Inc. v. Virtual Technologies, Inc., 400 F.3d 1007, 1011 (7th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Westefer v. Neal, 682 F.3d 679, 683 (7th Cir. 2012)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.