Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois granted Terrance Olden leave to file an amended complaint and conducted merit review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court allowed Eighth Amendment excessive-force and failure-to-intervene claims to proceed against specified defendants, dismissed remaining claims, and ordered service and related case-management procedures.
Holdings
- The plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint was granted, and the proposed amended complaint was ordered docketed.
- The amended complaint stated an Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim against Defendant Kirk based on the alleged chemical spray, excessively tight handcuffing, and head-slamming incident, and that claim was permitted to proceed.
- The amended complaint stated Eighth Amendment failure-to-intervene claims against Jane Doe and John Doe in their individual capacities based on their alleged failure to stop the second incident.
- The remaining claims were dismissed from the action because the allegations concerning other officials were too vague to plausibly show advance knowledge of Kirk's alleged excessive force or a connection between Kirk's actions and the plaintiff's First Amendment activity.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to file an amended complaint.
- Whether the amended complaint stated an Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim against Defendant Kirk.
- Whether the amended complaint stated Eighth Amendment failure-to-intervene claims against Jane Doe and John Doe in their individual capacities.
- Whether the plaintiff's remaining allegations stated plausible claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Turley v. Rednour, 729 F.3d 645, 649 (7th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Alexander v. U.S., 721 F.3d 418, 422 (7th Cir. 2013)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…