Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Alaska dismissed Brandon Eugene Douglass’s prisoner civil-rights complaint against the Alaska Child Support Enforcement Division upon screening. The court held that the claims, which sought to challenge paternity and obtain reimbursement of child support payments and punitive damages, implicated domestic-relations matters outside federal jurisdiction; dismissal was without prejudice and without leave to amend.
Holdings
- The federal court must decline jurisdiction over claims whose resolution would require adjudicating paternity, parent-child status, or child-support matters governed by state domestic-relations law.
- A plaintiff cannot create federal jurisdiction by styling a dispute over paternity and child-support payments as a constitutional due-process claim when the substance of the action remains a domestic-relations dispute.
- Leave to amend was properly denied because the jurisdictional defect could not be cured by additional factual allegations.
Questions Presented
- Whether the federal district court had subject-matter jurisdiction over claims requiring adjudication of paternity and reimbursement of child-support payments.
- Whether styling the claims as constitutional due-process violations permitted federal adjudication of the underlying domestic-relations dispute.
- Whether amendment should be permitted after screening.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (12)
- United States ex rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc., 971 F.2d 244, 248 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d at 1127(followed)
- Henderson ex rel. Henderson v. Shinseki, 562 U.S. 428, 434 (2011)(followed)
- Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006)(followed)
- Wilson v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330, 337 (2016), as revised (May 24, 2016)(followed)
- Vickie Lynn Marshall v. E. Pierce Marshall, Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293, 308 (2006)(followed)
- Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 702-704 (1992)(followed)
- Buechold v. Ortiz, 401 F.2d 371, 372 (9th Cir. 1968)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…