Loren J. Larson Jr. v. Jonathan Barcus, et al.

Larson v. Barcus · United States District Court for the District of Alaska · February 12, 2026 · No. 3:25-cv-00296-SLG

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Alaska screened Loren J. Larson Jr.'s complaint alleging violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. The court found plausible claims sufficient to proceed, directed the defendants to answer or otherwise respond within 21 days, and issued instructions concerning filings, service, copies, address changes, and compliance with court rules.

Holdings

  1. Liberally construed, the First Amended Complaint states a plausible claim under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act and may proceed to the next stage of litigation.
  2. The preliminary screening determination does not preclude defendants from challenging the sufficiency of the complaint through a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or another appropriate motion.
  3. A notice of appearance filed in federal court does not by itself waive service of process, but an appearance ordinarily constitutes an overt act by which a party comes into court and submits to the court's jurisdiction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the First Amended Complaint stated a plausible claim under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act sufficient to proceed past screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
  2. Whether Barcus's appearance through counsel affected service or otherwise supported directing the defendants to respond.
  3. What procedural and filing requirements should govern the action going forward.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1123 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Benny v. Pipes, 799 F.2d 489, 492 (9th Cir. 1986), amended, 807 F.2d 1514 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Norsworthy v. Beard, 87 F. Supp. 3d 1104, 1111 n.4 (N.D. Cal. 2015)(followed)
  • Teahan v. Wilhelm, 481 F. Supp. 2d 1115, 1119 (S.D. Cal. 2007)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…