Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Alaska screened Vincent Lawrence Roberts’s prisoner civil-rights complaint against the Fairbanks Correctional Center and Anchorage Correctional Complex. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, concluding that the named correctional facilities were not proper § 1983 defendants and that the allegations concerning housing, news access, legal copies, and postage were insufficiently specific. The court granted Roberts 60 days to file an amended complaint or voluntarily dismiss the action and denied his incomplete application to waive prepayment of the filing fee.
Holdings
- The Fairbanks Correctional Center and Anchorage Correctional Complex could not be sued under § 1983 because they are prison facilities operated by the Alaska Department of Corrections and are not persons subject to suit; as state instrumentalities, they are also protected by Eleventh Amendment immunity.
- The complaint failed to state a § 1983 claim because it did not identify individual defendants, allege a specific injury to Roberts, or establish an affirmative link between that injury and a particular defendant's conduct.
- The complaint failed to state a Fourteenth Amendment conditions-of-confinement claim because it did not allege facts showing that each defendant intentionally imposed constitutionally deficient conditions, exposed Roberts to a substantial risk of serious harm, acted objectively unreasonably, and thereby caused his injury.
- The complaint improperly presented multiple unrelated claims concerning housing, news access, and legal copies or postage in one action and failed to allege the required personal injury and defendant-specific facts.
- The application to waive prepayment of the filing fee was properly denied because Roberts did not use the required District of Alaska form or provide the required six-month prisoner trust-account statement.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Fairbanks Correctional Center and Anchorage Correctional Complex.
- Whether the allegations concerning housing, access to news, and legal copies and postage stated actionable constitutional claims.
- Whether the complaint satisfied the requirements for pleading personal injury, personal participation, and proper joinder of claims and defendants.
- Whether the plaintiff's application to waive prepayment of the filing fee complied with federal and District of Alaska requirements.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (41)
- United States ex rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc., 971 F.2d 244, 248 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Bernhardt v. L.A. County, 339 F.3d 920, 925 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors, 266 F.3d 979, 988 (9th Cir. 2001), amended by 275 F.3d 1187 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- United States v. Ritchie, 342 F.3d 903, 908 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Dep't, 839 F.2d 621, 623 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Schreiber Distributing Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co., 806 F.2d 1393, 1401 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)(followed)
- Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 41.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.