Tamisha Lewis-Junge v. Hiland Mountain Correctional Center; Office of Children Services; and Anchorage School District, et al.

Lewis-Junge · United States District Court for the District of Alaska · February 20, 2026 · No. 3:25-cv-00201 RRB; 3:25-cv-00202 RRB; 3:25-cv-00210 RRB

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Alaska dismissed three cases filed by Tamisha Lewis-Junge without prejudice for failure to prosecute and comply with the court’s screening order. The court applied the five-factor framework for dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), denied pending motions as moot, and directed the Clerk to enter final judgment and close the cases.

Holdings

  1. Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) was warranted because Plaintiff failed to comply with the court's deadline and failed to prosecute the actions diligently.
  2. The actions were dismissed without prejudice.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should dismiss the actions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's screening order.
  2. Whether dismissal should be with or without prejudice.
  3. Whether any lesser sanction would be satisfactory or effective.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399(followed)
  • Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423-1424(followed)
  • Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-643(followed)
  • Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 942 F.2d 648, 652(followed)
  • Anderson v. Air West, 542 F.2d 522, 524(followed)
  • In re Phenylpropanolamine Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1228(followed)
  • Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. New Images of Beverly Hills, 482 F.3d 1091, 1096(followed)
  • Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…