Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona issued a Report and Recommendation addressing the plaintiff’s failure to return service packets and comply with repeated court orders in a medical-care action. The magistrate judge recommended withdrawing the reference and dismissing the complaint and action without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Holdings
- The magistrate judge recommended dismissal because Plaintiff's repeated failure to provide service packets or respond to orders prevented the action from progressing and, after repeated warnings, warranted dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
- The magistrate judge recommended dismissal without prejudice because dismissal with prejudice would be unnecessarily harsh, while dismissal without prejudice was an adequate lesser sanction.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed sua sponte for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders requiring Plaintiff to provide service packets.
- Whether dismissal should be with or without prejudice in light of the five-factor failure-to-prosecute analysis and the availability of lesser sanctions.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-31, 633 (1962)(followed)
- Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399-401 (9th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Wanderer v. Johnson, 910 F.2d 652, 656 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)(followed)
- Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1146-47 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…