Summary
This Report and Recommendation addresses Best Western International Incorporated’s motion for default judgment against Anderson Hospitality LLC, Ankit Panchal, and Nikita Panchal. The court recommends granting default judgment on claims involving breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unauthorized post-termination use of Best Western trademarks. It recommends an award of $161,053.04, plus specified prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and permits Best Western to seek attorneys’ fees and costs.
Holdings
- The court determined that it had jurisdiction to consider the action and the requested default judgment based on Best Western's federal trademark-related claims and the asserted jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. § 1121.
- The Eitel factors favored entry of default judgment on Best Western's breach-of-contract and implied-covenant claims, and the recommendation was to grant the motion.
- The complaint adequately alleged a breach-of-contract claim because it alleged the existence of the Membership Agreement, defendants' failure to make required payments, and resulting damages.
- The complaint adequately alleged that defendants breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by failing to honor their payment obligations and ignoring demands for payment.
- Best Western adequately proved $161,053.04 in damages, consisting of $87,183.14 in unpaid contractual amounts and $73,869.90 in liquidated damages for unauthorized trademark use, and was entitled to prejudgment interest at 1.5% per month and post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
- Best Western was entitled under the Membership Agreement to seek attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with defendants' breach.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court had subject-matter and personal jurisdiction to consider default judgment.
- Whether the Eitel factors supported entry of default judgment against defendants.
- Whether Best Western proved entitlement to $161,053.04 in contractual and liquidated damages, prejudgment interest, and post-judgment interest.
- Whether Best Western was entitled under the Membership Agreement to seek attorneys' fees and costs.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (19)
- Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980)(followed)
- Tuli v. Republic of Iraq, 172 F.3d 707, 712 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Geddes v. United Fin. Grp., 559 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir. 1977)(followed)
- Zekelman Industries Inc. v. Marker, No. CV-19-02109-PHX-DWL, 2020 WL 1495210, at *3 (D. Ariz. Mar. 27, 2020)(followed)
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. California Security Cans., 238 F. Supp. 2d 1172, 1177 (C.D. Cal. 2002)(followed)
- Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Crawford, 226 F.R.D. 388, 392 (C.D. Cal. 2005)(followed)
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Streeter, 438 F. Supp. 2d 1065, 1071-72 (D. Ariz. 2006)(followed)
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. Caridi, 346 F. Supp. 2d 1068, 1073 (C.D. Cal. 2004)(followed)
- Vietnam Reform Party v. Viet Tan-Vietnam Reform Party, 416 F. Supp. 3d 948, 962 (N.D. Cal. 2019)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 19.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…