Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona determined that two appeals arising from the same bankruptcy ruling were duplicative. Because the certificate of readiness had been filed in the later appeal, the court dismissed the earlier appeal, CV-25-04149-PHX-KML, and directed that future proceedings occur in CV-25-04259-PHX-KML. The court also reminded the self-represented appellant that documents must be properly filed and that his opening brief was due within 14 days of January 5, 2026.
Holdings
- The two appeals were duplicative because both sought review of the bankruptcy court's denial of Harold Ocker's motion for relief from judgment or order; therefore, one appeal had to be dismissed.
- Documents or communications sent to the court's chambers email address, which may be used only to submit proposed orders, are not properly filed and will not be considered unless filed through the proper filing process.
Questions Presented
- Whether two appeals from related bankruptcy-court rulings were duplicative and whether one appeal should therefore be dismissed.
- Whether documents and communications sent to the court's chambers email address constituted properly filed documents.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 2012)(overruled_authority)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…