Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona ruled on Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in Joseph Lee McDonald’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action concerning restrictions on his communications with his wife, a former correctional officer. The court denied summary judgment on the First Amendment familial-association claim because disputed facts remained under the Turner factors, but granted summary judgment on the First Amendment retaliation claim. The court also denied Plaintiff’s motion for a court order, dismissed Count Two, and referred the action for a settlement conference.
Holdings
- Summary judgment was inappropriate on Count One because disputed facts concerning alternative means of communication, the effect of accommodating communication, and whether the blanket prohibition was an exaggerated response prevented completion of the Turner analysis.
- Defendants were entitled to summary judgment on Count Two because Plaintiff failed to present evidence sufficient to establish that his protected First Amendment activity was a substantial or motivating factor in Defendants' disciplinary actions.
- The court denied Plaintiff's request for relief against Jennifer Bechlor because she was not a party to the action and the court lacked jurisdiction over her.
- No relief could be granted concerning a purported ban on communications with McDonald's daughters because the record contained no evidence that such a restriction existed.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendants were entitled to summary judgment on McDonald's First Amendment familial-association claim based on the prohibition against communicating with his wife, a former SCC employee.
- Whether Defendants were entitled to summary judgment on McDonald's First Amendment retaliation claim where the disciplinary actions were based on his communications with his wife and Plaintiff offered evidence of alleged retaliatory motive.
- Whether Plaintiff could obtain injunctive relief against Jennifer Bechlor, who was not a party to the action.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (26)
- Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc)(followed)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986)(followed)
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Fritz Co., 210 F.3d 1099, 1102-03 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248-50, 255 (1986)(followed)
- Triton Energy Corp. v. Square D. Co., 68 F.3d 1216, 1221 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Service Co., 391 U.S. 253, 288-89 (1968)(followed)
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)(followed)
- Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 647-8 (19987)(followed)
- Overton v. Bazzetta, 539 U.S. 126, 131-35 (2003)(followed)
- Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576, 586, 589 (1984)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 26.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.