Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted Realty Executives LLC’s motion to dismiss claims arising from alleged anticompetitive real estate commission practices. The court held that the plaintiff lacked Article III standing because the amended complaint did not plausibly allege a horizontal conspiracy connecting Realty Executives to the brokers with whom the plaintiff transacted, and it denied leave to amend as futile.
Holdings
- A plaintiff whose injury was caused by a broker other than the defendant must plausibly allege that the defendant participated in the same horizontal conspiracy as the broker involved in the plaintiff's transaction to establish that the injury is fairly traceable to the defendant.
- The fact that multiple brokers adopted the same association rule does not, by itself, plausibly establish a horizontal conspiracy when the brokers had independent economic incentives to adopt the rule.
- Leave to amend was properly denied when the plaintiff did not request amendment, failed to comply with the applicable local rule, and represented that he had no additional facts to allege, making amendment futile.
Questions Presented
- Whether Masiello plausibly alleged that his injury was fairly traceable to Realty Executives when he did not transact with Realty Executives and relied on a conspiracy theory.
- Whether the amended complaint plausibly alleged a horizontal conspiracy among brokers sufficient to establish traceability for Article III standing.
- Whether Masiello should receive leave to amend the complaint.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (14)
- Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 559-61 (1992)(followed)
- Wolfson v. Brammer, 616 F.3d 1045, 1056 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- O'Shea v. Littleton, 414 U.S. 488, 494 (1974)(followed)
- La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Co., 489 F.2d 461, 466 (9th Cir. 1973)(followed)
- Beltz Travel Serv., Inc. v. International Air Transport Ass'n, 620 F.2d 1360, 1367 (9th Cir. 1980)(followed)
- In re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation, 169 F.R.D. 493, 508 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 545, 553, 566-67 (2007)(followed)
- In re Musical Instruments & Equipment Antitrust Litigation, 798 F.3d 1186, 1192-95 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- United States v. Apple, Inc., 791 F.3d 290, 314-15, 319-20 (2d Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Dickson v. Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 203 (4th Cir. 2002)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…