Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona adopted a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action. The court overruled the petitioner’s objections, denied the habeas petition, denied a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and directed the Clerk to enter judgment.
Holdings
- The district court conducted de novo review of the report and recommendation and properly considered Petitioner's objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
- The report and recommendation was adopted, Petitioner's objections were overruled, and the § 2254 habeas petition was denied.
- A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal were denied because Petitioner had not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Questions Presented
- What standard of review governs a district court's review of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation when timely objections are filed under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)?
- Whether the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus denied.
- Whether Petitioner was entitled to a certificate of appealability or leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- United States v. Ramos, 65 F.4th 427, 433-34 (9th Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985)(followed)
- United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Warling v. Ryan, 2013 WL 5276367, at *2 (D. Ariz. 2013)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…