Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation after no objections were filed. The court reversed the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision and remanded the matter for further proceedings, including reanalysis and rehearing.
Holdings
- When neither party objects to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court is not required to review the recommendation under any specified standard of review, though it may conduct further review sua sponte or at a party's request under a de novo or other standard.
- The Report and Recommendation was adopted, and the Commissioner's final decision was reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the magistrate judge's recommendation.
Questions Presented
- What standard of review applies when neither party objects to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation?
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's recommendation to reverse and remand the Commissioner's final decision.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (1)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150, 154 (1985)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…