EagleBank v. Yajia Hu Schwartz et al.

Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-01762-SBP · United States District Court for the District of Colorado · November 24, 2025 · No. 1:22-cv-01762-SBP

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado grants EagleBank’s motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) to voluntarily dismiss without prejudice its remaining Colorado Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act claim. The court concludes that the defendants identify no legal prejudice and directs entry of final judgment on the claims and counterclaims previously adjudicated, awards EagleBank its costs, and permits it to seek attorney’s fees.

Holdings

  1. A plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss a claim under Rule 41(a)(2) without prejudice when the opposing party will not suffer legal prejudice, and the court granted EagleBank's motion because the Ohlander factors supported dismissal.
  2. The defendants did not demonstrate legal prejudice that would justify denying dismissal of the CUFTA claim without prejudice.
  3. The defendants were not entitled to Rule 41(b) dismissal with prejudice, fee-shifting, sanctions, or expungement because Rule 41(b) concerns involuntary dismissals and the record did not show failure to prosecute or failure to comply with the Federal Rules or a court order.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether EagleBank should be permitted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) to voluntarily dismiss its remaining CUFTA claim without prejudice over the defendants' opposition.
  2. Whether the defendants established legal prejudice sufficient to deny voluntary dismissal.
  3. Whether the defendants were entitled to dismissal with prejudice, attorney's fees, sanctions, or expungement under Rule 41(b) based on EagleBank's prosecution of the CUFTA claim.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (13)

  • Tax Lien Law Grp., LLC v. EagleBank, No. 1129, Sept. Term 2020, 2021 WL 3360972, at *1 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. Aug. 3, 2021)(followed)
  • United States ex rel. Stone v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 282 F.3d 787, 810 (10th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531, 1537 (10th Cir. 1997)(followed)
  • Front Row Techs., LLC v. NBA Media Ventures, LLC, No. CIV 10-0433 JB/SCY, 2016 WL 5395278, at *5 (D.N.M. Aug. 31, 2016), aff’d sub nom. Front Row Techs. LLC v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P., 697 F. App’x 701 (Fed. Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Phillips U.S.A., Inc. v. Allflex U.S.A., Inc., 77 F.3d 354, 358 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Clark v. Tansy, 13 F.3d 1407, 1411 (10th Cir. 1993)(followed)
  • Mitchell v. Roberts, 43 F.4th 1074, 1083 (10th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Am. Nat’l Bank & Tr. Co. v. Bic Corp., 931 F.2d 1411, 1412 (10th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Tal v. Hogan, 453 F.3d 1244, 1264 n.24 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Stan Lee Media, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co., 774 F.3d 1292, 1298 n.2 (10th Cir. 2014)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…