Maria J. Prkic v. Sezzle, Inc.

Civil Action No. 24-cv-02624-PAB-NRN · United States District Court for the District of Colorado · December 30, 2025 · No. 24-cv-02624-PAB-NRN

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado denied without prejudice Plaintiff Maria J. Prkic’s motion to compel production of an original, unedited videotaped deposition recording and for sanctions. The court explained that Plaintiff should first obtain and compare the deposition transcript with the video segments in her possession before seeking further relief. The court also found no necessary irregularity in the deposition and concluded that concerns not raised during the deposition were waived.

Holdings

  1. The motion to compel production of the original, unedited videotaped deposition recording and for sanctions was denied without prejudice because Plaintiff had not yet reviewed the deposition transcript or compared it with the video.
  2. Plaintiff's concerns or objections concerning the conduct of the deposition were waived to the extent she failed to raise them with the court when the deposition was being taken.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff was entitled to an order compelling production of the original, unedited videotaped deposition recording and sanctions before reviewing the deposition transcript.
  2. Whether Plaintiff's alleged deposition irregularities warranted relief when she did not raise the relevant objections or concerns during the deposition.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (2)

  • Sinclair Wyo. Ref. Co. v. A & B Builders, Ltd., 989 F.3d 747, 782 (10th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • Morales-Fernandez v. INS, 418 F.3d 1116, 1119, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005)(exception recognized)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…