Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Colorado held that A.T., a detained Honduran noncitizen, was detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than the mandatory-detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1225 or § 1226(c). The court concluded that her prolonged detention without an individualized bond hearing violated procedural and substantive due process. Given the length and circumstances of the detention, including her deferred-action-related bona fide determination, the court ordered Respondents to transport A.T. to her residence and release her.
Holdings
- Neither 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) nor § 1225(b)(2) authorized A.T.'s detention because she was not an arriving noncitizen or presently and actively seeking admission. The default discretionary-detention framework of § 1226(a) therefore governed.
- A.T.'s continued detention for more than two years under § 1226(a) without an individualized bond hearing violated her Fifth Amendment procedural due process rights.
- By detaining A.T. for more than two years without a bond hearing and without an affirmative finding that she was a flight risk or danger to the community, the Government arbitrarily confined her in violation of substantive due process.
- Immediate release, rather than another bond hearing, was the appropriate remedy because a bond hearing would not adequately cure the constitutional violations caused by A.T.'s prolonged and apparently indefinite detention.
Questions Presented
- Whether A.T. was detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1), § 1225(b)(2), or the default discretionary-detention provision, § 1226(a).
- Whether the Government's failure to provide A.T. an individualized bond hearing during more than two years of detention violated procedural due process.
- Whether A.T.'s prolonged detention without an affirmative finding that she was a flight risk or danger to the community violated substantive due process.
- Whether immediate release, rather than a bond hearing, was the appropriate habeas remedy under the circumstances.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (29)
- Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973)(followed)
- Soberanes v. Comfort, 388 F.3d 1305, 1310 (10th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687–88, 690, 701 (2001)(followed)
- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 287, 289, 297, 303 (2018)(followed)
- Quispe-Ardiles v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01382-MSN-WEF, 2025 WL 2783800, at *5, *7 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2025)(followed)
- Nielsen v. Preap, 586 U.S. 392, 396 (2019)(followed)
- Martinez v. Ceja, 760 F. Supp. 3d 1188, 1192–93 (D. Colo. 2024)(followed)
- Rodriguez v. Bostock, 779 F. Supp. 3d 1239, 1246 (W.D. Wash. 2025)(followed)
- Aroldo Rodriguez Diaz v. Merrick Garland, Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland, 53 F.4th 1189, 1196 (9th Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, 802 F. Supp. 3d 297, 304 (D. Mass. Oct. 3, 2025)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 29.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.