Conejo v. Nicholas

Civil Action No. 24-cv-00232-CNS-NRN (D. Colo. Mar. 30, 2026) · United States District Court for the District of Colorado · March 30, 2026 · No. 24-cv-00232-CNS-NRN

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado reviews objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation concerning default judgment in an action for unpaid wages under the FLSA and Colorado wage laws. The court affirms the recommendation in part but allows the plaintiffs to recover treble damages for theft of services in addition to statutory wage penalties, concluding that the remedies are not duplicative because they address distinct wrongdoings and injuries. The court directs entry of final judgment against the defendant.

Holdings

  1. A federal district court may enter default judgment only after establishing both subject-matter jurisdiction over the action and personal jurisdiction over the defaulting defendant; those requirements were satisfied here.
  2. Where a defendant fails to plead or otherwise defend, and the well-pleaded allegations establish a viable legal claim, the court may enter default judgment after determining jurisdiction and the amount of recoverable damages.
  3. FLSA liquidated damages and Colorado Wage Claims Act statutory penalties are analytically distinct and may both be awarded because FLSA liquidated damages compensate employees while the CWCA penalty punishes employers for wrongful nonpayment.
  4. An employee may recover treble damages under C.R.S. § 18-4-405 in addition to CWCA statutory penalties when the wage withholding involved separate intentional or fraudulent wrongdoing and caused distinct injuries; such recovery is not impermissible double compensation on the facts presented.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court had subject-matter and personal jurisdiction to enter default judgment.
  2. Whether the admitted allegations and supporting materials established entitlement to default judgment on the FLSA and Colorado wage claims.
  3. Whether FLSA liquidated damages and Colorado Wage Claims Act statutory penalties serve distinct purposes and may both be awarded.
  4. Whether plaintiffs could recover treble damages under Colorado's theft statute in addition to statutory penalties under the Colorado Wage Claims Act without impermissible double recovery.
  5. Whether the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted or reversed in light of plaintiffs' limited objection.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (32)

  • Olcott v. Del. Flood Co., 327 F.3d 1115, 1124-25 (10th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • In re Rains, 946 F.2d 731, 732 (10th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Bixler v. Foster, 596 F.3d 751, 761-62 (10th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Williams v. Life Sav. & Loan, 802 F.2d 1200, 1203 (10th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Tripodi v. Welch, 810 F.3d 761, 765 (10th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Bryson v. Gonzales, 534 F.3d 1282, 1286 (10th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Marcus Food Co. v. Dipanfilo, 671 F.3d 1159, 1171-72 (10th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Hunt v. Inter-Globe Energy, Inc., 770 F.2d 145, 148 (10th Cir. 1985)(followed)
  • Venable v. Haislip, 621 F.2d 297, 300 (10th Cir. 1980)(followed)
  • United States v. 2121 East 30th St., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059-60 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 32.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…