Maestre-Jimenez v. Baltazar

Maestre-Jimenez · United States District Court for the District of Colorado · May 14, 2026 · No. 1:26-cv-01782-CNS

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado denied Yurieth Lucia Maestre-Jimenez’s motion for reconsideration of an order granting habeas relief and requiring an immigration bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). The court held that Petitioner had not shown an intervening change in law, newly available evidence, clear error, or manifest injustice warranting immediate release instead of a bond hearing.

Holdings

  1. Reconsideration was not warranted because Petitioner did not demonstrate an intervening change in controlling law, newly available evidence, clear error, or manifest injustice.
  2. The prior order requiring a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than immediate release, was not clear error and did not result in manifest injustice.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Petitioner established grounds under Rule 54(b) for reconsideration of the prior interlocutory order.
  2. Whether the Court clearly erred or caused manifest injustice by ordering a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) rather than ordering Petitioner's immediate release from immigration detention.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Thompson Theatres, Inc., 621 F.2d 1088, 1090 (10th Cir.)(followed)
  • Trujillo v. Bd. of Educ. of Albuquerque Public Schools, 212 Fed.Appx. 760, 765 (10th Cir.)(followed)
  • Servants of the Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir.)(followed)
  • Nava Hernandez v. Baltazar, No. 25-cv-03094-CNS, 2025 WL 2996643 (D. Colo. Oct. 24, 2025)(applied)
  • Singh v. Baltazar, 2026 WL 352870 (D. Colo. Feb. 9, 2026)(distinguished)
  • Loa Caballero v. Baltazar, No. 25-cv-03120-NYW, 2025 WL 2977650, at *9 (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2025)(applied)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…