Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Colorado denied Yurieth Lucia Maestre-Jimenez’s motion for reconsideration of an order granting habeas relief and requiring an immigration bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). The court held that Petitioner had not shown an intervening change in law, newly available evidence, clear error, or manifest injustice warranting immediate release instead of a bond hearing.
Holdings
- Reconsideration was not warranted because Petitioner did not demonstrate an intervening change in controlling law, newly available evidence, clear error, or manifest injustice.
- The prior order requiring a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than immediate release, was not clear error and did not result in manifest injustice.
Questions Presented
- Whether Petitioner established grounds under Rule 54(b) for reconsideration of the prior interlocutory order.
- Whether the Court clearly erred or caused manifest injustice by ordering a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) rather than ordering Petitioner's immediate release from immigration detention.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Thompson Theatres, Inc., 621 F.2d 1088, 1090 (10th Cir.)(followed)
- Trujillo v. Bd. of Educ. of Albuquerque Public Schools, 212 Fed.Appx. 760, 765 (10th Cir.)(followed)
- Servants of the Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir.)(followed)
- Nava Hernandez v. Baltazar, No. 25-cv-03094-CNS, 2025 WL 2996643 (D. Colo. Oct. 24, 2025)(applied)
- Singh v. Baltazar, 2026 WL 352870 (D. Colo. Feb. 9, 2026)(distinguished)
- Loa Caballero v. Baltazar, No. 25-cv-03120-NYW, 2025 WL 2977650, at *9 (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2025)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…