Mouad El Ahrach v. Juan Baltazar, et al.

El Ahrach v. Baltazar · United States District Court for the District of Colorado · May 5, 2026 · No. 1:25-cv-03195-PAB

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado grants Mouad El Ahrach’s unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The court finds that El Ahrach was the prevailing party in her habeas action and that respondents’ nonopposition establishes the absence of substantial justification and special circumstances. The court awards $7,175.19 in attorneys’ fees to her counsel.

Holdings

  1. A petitioner who obtains habeas relief compelling release from immigration detention is a prevailing party for purposes of the EAJA.
  2. Where respondents did not oppose the fee motion, the Court treated them as implicitly conceding that their position was not substantially justified and that no special circumstances made a fee award unjust.
  3. The requested attorneys' fee award of $7,175.19 was reasonable.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether petitioner qualified as a prevailing party under the Equal Access to Justice Act after obtaining habeas relief and release from detention.
  2. Whether petitioner was entitled to attorneys' fees under the EAJA where respondents did not oppose the motion, thereby conceding that their position was not substantially justified and that no special circumstances made an award unjust.
  3. Whether the requested attorneys' fee amount of $7,175.19 was reasonable.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Hackett v. Barnhart, 475 F.3d 1166, 1172 (10th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Guzman Chavez, 594 U.S. 523, 531-32 (2021)(followed)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…