Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia grants Matthew Robert Elmore’s application to proceed in forma pauperis but dismisses his pro se civil complaint and the action without prejudice. The court concludes that the complaint fails to satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) because it does not establish a jurisdictional basis or provide sufficient factual allegations to notify the defendant of the claims.
Holdings
- The complaint did not satisfy Rule 8(a) because it failed to state a basis for the court's jurisdiction and did not provide enough factual information to put the defendant on notice of the claim or claims against her.
- Dismissal of the complaint and civil action without prejudice was warranted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the pro se complaint satisfied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)'s requirements for stating the grounds for jurisdiction, showing entitlement to relief, and demanding relief.
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed without prejudice because it failed to identify a jurisdictional basis and failed to provide fair notice of the claims.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972)(followed)
- Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987)(followed)
- Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…