Summary
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia grants Plaintiff Valerie Flores leave to proceed in forma pauperis but dismisses her pro se complaint against Glover House. The court concludes that the complaint fails to provide sufficient factual allegations or fair notice of a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.
Holdings
- The complaint failed to satisfy Rule 8 because it did not allege facts about the named defendant or otherwise provide sufficient facts to give the defendant fair notice of the claim and the grounds on which it rested; the complaint was therefore dismissed.
- The court granted Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff's pro se complaint stated a claim and provided sufficient factual allegations and fair notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.
- Whether Plaintiff should be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (6)
- Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972)(followed)
- Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., 789 F.3d 146, 150 (D.C. Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977)(followed)
- Jones v. Kirchner, 835 F.3d 74, 79 (D.C. Cir. 2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…