Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia denied Fonds des Missions’ motions for a preliminary and permanent injunction seeking to compel UnitedHealth Group Inc. to include a shareholder proposal in its proxy materials. The proposal requested a report concerning the healthcare consequences of UnitedHealth Group’s acquisitions over the preceding ten years. The court concluded that the plaintiff had not shown a likelihood of success on its claim that the proposal was improperly excluded under SEC Rule 14a-8(i)(7), and denied the permanent-injunction motion without prejudice.
Holdings
- Plaintiff did not make the clear showing required to establish a likelihood of success because the proposal, as worded, did not clearly focus on significant policy issues transcending UnitedHealth Group's ordinary business operations.
- The motion for a preliminary injunction was denied because plaintiff failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits.
- The court denied the motion for a permanent injunction without prejudice and declined to resolve the merits with prejudice on the existing record.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff showed a likelihood of success on its claim that UnitedHealth Group improperly excluded its shareholder proposal under the ordinary-business exclusion in 17 C.F.R. § 240.14a-8(i)(7).
- Whether the proposal focused on sufficiently significant social-policy issues that transcended UnitedHealth Group's day-to-day business matters under the SEC's 1998 interpretive release.
- Whether plaintiff was entitled to a preliminary injunction compelling inclusion of the proposal in UnitedHealth Group's proxy materials.
- Whether the court should resolve the merits and permanently enjoin exclusion of the proposal at the preliminary stage.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (24)
- Institutional S’holder Servs. Inc. v. SEC, 718 F. Supp. 3d 7, 11 (D.D.C. 2024)(followed)
- Trinity Wall St. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 792 F.3d 323, 334-37, 341-42, 346-47, 353 (3d Cir. 2015)(considered)
- As You Sow v. Chubb Ltd., No. 26-cv-734, 2026 WL 879666, at *1-2, *5-9 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2026)(followed in part)
- Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Union v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 821 F. Supp. 877, 881-82 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)(followed)
- Apache Corp. v. Chevedden, 696 F. Supp. 2d 723, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2010)(followed)
- KBR Inc. v. Chevedden, 776 F. Supp. 2d 415, 419 (S.D. Tex. 2011)(followed)
- Heritage Found. v. Airbnb, Inc., No. 25-cv-676, 2026 WL 395797, at *4 (D. Del. Feb. 12, 2026)(followed)
- Grimes v. Centerior Energy Corp., 909 F.2d 529, 531-32 (D.C. Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Medical Committee for Human Rights v. SEC, 432 F.2d 659, 679 (D.C. Cir. 1970), vacated as moot, 404 U.S. 403 (1972)(followed)
- Roosevelt v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 958 F.2d 416, 426, 428 (D.C. Cir. 1992)(considered)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.