Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia addresses supplemental relief following a partial default judgment in a trademark infringement and unfair competition action involving competing cryptocurrency tokens. The court awards Safex Foundation $845,269.40 in defendant profits and $130,149.00 in attorney fees, while explaining its calculation of recoverable profits and the reasonableness of the requested fees.
Holdings
- Safex was entitled to recover SafeLaunch's profits attributable to the willful infringement, but the requested amount had to be adjusted to exclude double-counted transactions and profits not sufficiently tied to SafeLaunch's distributions. The Court awarded $845,269.40.
- Safex was entitled to attorney fees because it was the prevailing party in an exceptional Lanham Act case involving admitted willful infringement.
- Safex established that its requested $130,149.00 fee award, based on 112.7 hours of work, was reasonable, and the Court awarded the full amount.
Questions Presented
- What amount of SafeLaunch's profits was attributable to its unlawful use of the Safex mark and properly recoverable under the Lanham Act?
- Whether Safex established entitlement to the requested attorney fees and whether the requested hours and hourly rates were reasonable.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (21)
- Safex Found., Inc. v. SafeLaunch Ventures Ltd., 694 F. Supp. 3d 1, 6-7 (D.D.C. 2023)(followed)
- Safex Found., Inc. v. SafeLaunch Ventures Ltd., No. 22-cv-572 (CRC), 2025 WL 2377972, at *1-6 (D.D.C. Aug. 15, 2025)(followed)
- Adkins v. Teseo, 180 F. Supp. 2d 15, 17 (D.D.C. 2001)(followed)
- Boland v. Elite Terrazzo Flooring, Inc., 763 F. Supp. 2d 64, 67-68 (D.D.C. 2011)(followed)
- Flynn v. Mastro Masonry Contractors, 237 F. Supp. 2d 66, 69 (D.D.C. 2002)(followed)
- Breaking the Chain Found., Inc. v. Capitol Educ. Support, Inc., 589 F. Supp. 2d 25, 31 (D.D.C. 2008)(followed)
- Foxtrap, Inc. v. Foxtrap, Inc., 671 F.2d 636, 641-42 & n.11 (D.C. Cir. 1982)(followed)
- ALPO Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co., 913 F.2d 958, 968 (D.C. Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Yah Kai World Wide Enters., Inc. v. Napper, 292 F. Supp. 3d 337, 350, 357 (D.D.C. 2018)(followed)
- Riggs Inv. Mgmt. Corp. v. Columbia Inv. Partners, LLC, 975 F. Supp. 14, 16-17 (D.D.C. 1997)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 21.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…