Ali Richard v. Martin, et al.

Richard v. Martin · United States District Court for the District of Connecticut · December 31, 2025 · No. 3:20-cv-01354 (KAD)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Ali Richard’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The court concludes that the record does not establish that defendants confiscated Richard’s prayer shawl or Kurta shirt, that certain claims were unexhausted, and that the retaliation claim lacked a causal connection. The court directs the Clerk to enter judgment for defendants and close the case.

Holdings

  1. Summary judgment was warranted because the record contained no evidence that Rodriguez or any other defendant confiscated the prayer shawl or otherwise infringed Richard's religious exercise.
  2. Summary judgment was also warranted for Witkowski, Pudvah, Ocasio, Bellemare, and Williams because Richard failed to exhaust his administrative remedies concerning their alleged failure to assist in recovering the prayer shawl.
  3. Summary judgment was warranted because Richard offered no nonconclusory evidence that Pudvah or Bellemare knew of his prior lawsuits or failed to assist him because of those lawsuits.
  4. Summary judgment was warranted because the evidence did not permit a reasonable jury to find that Pudvah confiscated the Kurta shirt or infringed Richard's religious exercise.
  5. Summary judgment was warranted because Pudvah could not have been motivated by this lawsuit when the Kurta shirt allegedly disappeared in September 2021, before Pudvah was served or otherwise shown to have learned of the action.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether defendants were entitled to summary judgment on Richard's First Amendment free-exercise claim arising from the disappearance of his prayer shawl.
  2. Whether defendants were entitled to summary judgment on Richard's First Amendment retaliation claim based on alleged failure to assist in recovering the prayer shawl.
  3. Whether defendant Pudvah was entitled to summary judgment on Richard's First Amendment free-exercise and retaliation claims arising from the missing Kurta shirt.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (26)

  • Kravitz v. Purcell, 87 F.4th 111, 119, 128 (2d Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • O’Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, 349 (1987)(followed)
  • Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 (1987)(followed)
  • Ford v. McGinnis, 352 F.3d 582, 589 (2d Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security, 489 U.S. 829, 834 n.2 (1989)(followed)
  • Hicks v. Baines, 593 F.3d 159, 166 (2d Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Bacon v. Phelps, 961 F.3d 533, 542 (2d Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Crenshaw v. Herbert, 445 F. Supp. 2d 301, 303 (W.D.N.Y. 2006)(followed)
  • Graham v. Henderson, 89 F.3d 75, 80 (2d Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Franco v. Kelly, 854 F.2d 584, 590 (2d Cir. 1988)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 26.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…