Melvin Rodriguez v. GalaxE.Solutions, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut · April 6, 2026 · No. 3:24-cv-1737 (SRU)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut granted GalaxE.Solutions, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment in Melvin Rodriguez’s ADA and CFEPA employment-discrimination, failure-to-accommodate, and retaliation claims. The court held that Rodriguez failed to provide medical evidence establishing a disability and failed to show that he requested a reasonable accommodation or that his termination was causally connected to protected activity. The Clerk was instructed to close the case.

Holdings

  1. GalaxE was entitled to summary judgment on Rodriguez's ADA and CFEPA discrimination claims because Rodriguez failed to provide medical or other corroborating evidence establishing that his bladder condition constituted a disability under the ADA or a chronic physical disability under the CFEPA.
  2. GalaxE was entitled to summary judgment on Rodriguez's ADA and CFEPA failure-to-accommodate claims because Rodriguez failed to establish that he was disabled and, independently, failed to show that he actually requested additional bathroom breaks or clearly communicated his condition and accommodation need to GalaxE.
  3. GalaxE was entitled to summary judgment on Rodriguez's ADA and CFEPA retaliation claims because he failed to show that he engaged in protected activity by requesting an accommodation and, even assuming such a request, failed to establish a causal connection between the request and his termination.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Rodriguez presented sufficient evidence that he was disabled under the ADA or physically disabled under the CFEPA to support his disability-discrimination claims.
  2. Whether Rodriguez presented sufficient evidence that he requested a reasonable accommodation and that GalaxE refused to provide one.
  3. Whether Rodriguez presented sufficient evidence of protected activity, including a request for reasonable accommodation, and a causal connection between that activity and his termination.
  4. Whether GalaxE was entitled to summary judgment on all ADA and CFEPA claims.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (25)

  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-50, 255-56 (1986)(applied)
  • Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)(applied)
  • Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 158-59 (1970)(applied)
  • Aldrich v. Randolph Cent. Sch. Dist., 963 F.2d 520, 523 (2d Cir. 1992)(applied)
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 327 (1986)(applied)
  • Colon v. Coughlin, 58 F.3d 865, 872 (2d Cir. 1995)(applied)
  • Bryant v. Maffucci, 923 F.2d 979, 982 (2d Cir. 1991)(applied)
  • Suburban Propane v. Proctor Gas, Inc., 953 F.2d 780, 788 (2d Cir. 1992)(applied)
  • Goenaga v. March of Dimes Birth Defects Found., 51 F.3d 14, 18 (2d Cir. 1995)(applied)
  • Paiva v. City of Bridgeport, 2019 WL 3842400, at *6 (D. Conn. Aug. 15, 2019)(applied)

Showing top 10 of 25.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…