Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut denied Troy Jaynes's motion to proceed in forma pauperis under the Prison Litigation Reform Act's three-strikes rule. The court also denied his motion for appointment of counsel without prejudice as premature and held further proceedings in abeyance pending payment of the filing fee.
Holdings
- The three-strikes rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) applied because Plaintiff had at least three prior actions dismissed on qualifying grounds.
- The imminent-danger exception did not apply because the complaint alleged no facts showing that Plaintiff faced imminent danger of serious physical harm when he filed the action.
- The motion to appoint counsel was denied without prejudice as premature because Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)'s three-strikes bar applied based on Plaintiff's prior dismissals.
- Whether Plaintiff alleged imminent danger of serious physical injury sufficient to invoke the exception to the three-strikes bar.
- Whether Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel should be granted after denial of in forma pauperis status.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Pettus v. Morgenthau, 554 F.3d 293, 296 (2d Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Jaynes v. New Haven Police Dept, No. 07-CV-547 (RNC) (dismissed May 29, 2007)(relied upon as prior qualifying dismissal)
- Jaynes v. Superior Court, No. 07-CV-1051 (AVC) (dismissed July 18, 2007)(relied upon as prior qualifying dismissal)
- Jaynes v. Quiros, No. 21-CV-657 (VLB) (dismissed October 7, 2021)(relied upon as prior qualifying dismissal)
- Jaynes v. Sweeney, No. 21-CV-1464 (VAB) (dismissed July 1, 2022)(relied upon as prior qualifying dismissal)
- Akassy v. Hardy, No. 17-CV-4120, 2017 WL 6387729, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2017)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…