Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware screened a pro se prisoner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint concerning alleged falsification of a police report and improper prosecution while state criminal charges were pending. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the Younger abstention doctrine, denied as moot the motion for body-camera footage, and closed the case.
Holdings
- Younger abstention applies because Collins's state criminal proceeding is ongoing and judicial in nature, implicates important state interests, and provides an adequate opportunity to raise his federal concerns; therefore, the federal court must not interfere with the prosecution absent extraordinary circumstances.
- The complaint must be dismissed without prejudice under the Younger abstention doctrine at the preliminary screening stage.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should abstain under Younger from exercising jurisdiction over Collins's request to enjoin an ongoing Delaware criminal prosecution.
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed during statutory screening under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b).
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Association, 457 U.S. 423, 431 (1982)(followed)
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)(applied)
- Schall v. Joyce, 885 F.2d 101, 106 (3d Cir. 1989)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…