Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted PDV Holding, Inc.'s motion to dismiss Leroy A. Garrett's amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The court held that the complaint did not plausibly allege PDV Holding's liability for PDVSA's conduct, establish alter-ego liability, or identify a viable cause of action under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The court dismissed the amended complaint and denied a related emergency motion, while permitting any renewed request for leave to amend to be filed by January 16, 2026.
Court
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
Decision date
December 17, 2025
Docket number
C.A. No. 24-380-JLH
Disposition
dismissed
Questions Presented
- Whether the amended complaint pleaded sufficient facts to state a plausible claim against PDV Holding, Inc. under Rule 12(b)(6).
- Whether the amended complaint plausibly alleged that PDV Holding was PDVSA's alter ego.
- Whether the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act provisions invoked by Garrett supplied causes of action.
- Whether equitable relief or an injunction constituted an independent cause of action.
- Whether Garrett's pending request for emergency injunctive relief should be denied after dismissal of the operative pleading.
Holdings
- The amended complaint failed to state a claim because it pleaded only conclusory allegations and did not allege facts plausibly suggesting that PDV Holding was liable to Garrett for its own acts or for PDVSA's acts.
- The amended complaint did not plausibly allege that PDV Holding was PDVSA's alter ego.
- Sections 1605(a)(3) and 1605(a)(5) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act are jurisdictional exceptions and do not create causes of action or establish substantive rules of liability.
- Equitable relief, including an injunction, is a remedy and not an independent cause of action.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…