Ginger Diane G. v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

No. 1:25-cv-00114-DKG (D. Idaho Dec. 22, 2025) · United States District Court for the District of Idaho · December 22, 2025 · No. 1:25-cv-00114-DKG

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Idaho reviewed the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of the plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits. The court held that the administrative law judge failed to adequately explain the evaluation of the plaintiff’s hand-pain and rheumatoid-arthritis evidence and failed to account for that evidence in the residual functional capacity assessment. The court reversed the Commissioner’s decision and remanded the case for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Holdings

  1. The ALJ erred by failing to identify clear and convincing reasons, supported by the record, for discounting Plaintiff's statements concerning hand pain and limited hand functioning.
  2. The ALJ erred by failing to address relevant evidence concerning Plaintiff's severe rheumatoid arthritis, hand pain, and limited hand functioning when formulating the RFC.
  3. A remand for further administrative proceedings, rather than an immediate award of benefits, was appropriate.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the ALJ provided legally sufficient reasons for discounting Plaintiff's subjective symptom statements concerning hand pain and limited hand functioning.
  2. Whether the ALJ considered all relevant and significant evidence of rheumatoid arthritis and hand limitations when assessing Plaintiff's residual functional capacity.
  3. Whether the case should be remanded for further proceedings or for an immediate award of benefits.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (30)

  • Lounsburry v. Barnhart, 468 F.3d 1111, 1114 (9th Cir. 2006)(cited)
  • Tackett v. Apfel, 180 F.3d 1094, 1098-99 (9th Cir. 1999)(cited)
  • Revels v. Berryhill, 874 F.3d 648, 654 (9th Cir. 2017)(applied)
  • Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1154 (2019)(applied)
  • Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)(cited)
  • Garrison v. Colvin, 759 F.3d 995, 1009, 1020 (9th Cir. 2014)(applied)
  • Carmickle v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 533 F.3d 1155, 1160, 1165 (9th Cir. 2008)(applied)
  • Vincent on Behalf of Vincent v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1393, 1394-95 (9th Cir. 1984)(applied)
  • Hiler v. Astrue, 687 F.3d 1208, 1212 (9th Cir. 2012)(cited)
  • Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 F.3d 1028, 1035-38, 1040 (9th Cir. 2007)(applied)

Showing top 10 of 30.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…