Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Idaho grants the patient plaintiffs’ motion to proceed under pseudonyms in a challenge to Idaho’s implementation of H.B. 135 as applied to Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program services. The court finds that public disclosure could expose the plaintiffs to criminal prosecution, immigration consequences, stigma, retaliation, and disclosure of sensitive medical information. The court allows pseudonymity on the public docket while leaving potential disclosure to defense counsel for discovery to be addressed through meet-and-confer and, if necessary, further court relief.
Holdings
- The patient plaintiffs may proceed under pseudonyms for purposes of the public record because disclosure could expose them to criminal prosecution and immigration-related consequences and could create risks of stigma, retaliation, and disclosure of highly sensitive medical information.
- The court did not grant an unconditional right to withhold the plaintiffs’ identities from defense counsel and the Court; instead, any later need for disclosure must be addressed in discovery through a meet-and-confer and, if necessary, appropriate relief from the Court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the patient plaintiffs should be permitted to proceed under pseudonyms in the public record.
- Whether the plaintiffs were entitled to withhold their identities from defense counsel and the Court throughout the litigation.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Doe v. Kamehameha Sch./Bernice Pauahi Bishop Est., 596 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010)(applied)
- Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068 (9th Cir. 2000)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.