Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Idaho grants Danielle Rodriguez’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and waives the filing fee. The court finds her claims concerning termination of public housing assistance, alleged denial of due process, and failure to provide a disability-related reasonable accommodation legally sufficient to proceed past initial screening. The court declines to grant an ex parte temporary restraining order before hearing from the defendants and directs service of the litigation documents.
Holdings
- Rodriguez established that she was unable to pay the filing fee while providing for her necessities of life, and therefore qualified to proceed in forma pauperis.
- The complaint survived initial screening because it was not frivolous or malicious, stated plausible claims for relief, and did not seek monetary relief from an immune defendant.
- The court declined to grant ex parte emergency relief at that time because defendants had not yet been given an opportunity to respond and the asserted immediate harm was not sufficiently established.
Questions Presented
- Whether Rodriguez qualified to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
- Whether the complaint survived mandatory screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
- Whether the court should grant an emergency ex parte temporary restraining order before defendants had an opportunity to respond.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (10)
- Rice v. City of Boise City, 2013 WL 6385657, at *1 (D. Idaho Dec. 6, 2013)(followed)
- Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948)(followed)
- United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981)(followed)
- Jefferson v. United States, 277 F.2d 723, 725 (9th Cir. 1960)(followed)
- Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-78 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007)(followed)
- Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Pena v. Gardner, 976 F.2d 469, 471 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750, 758 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…