Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Idaho granted Edgar Agustin Moctezuma Macias’s motion for a temporary restraining order challenging his mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225. The court concluded that § 1225 does not apply to a noncitizen who entered the United States years earlier and was apprehended while residing in the country, and ordered his immediate release. Respondents were ordered to respond to the habeas petition by January 12, 2026.
Holdings
- The district court had jurisdiction to review Petitioner's challenge to detention without a bond hearing, although it lacked jurisdiction to review the underlying removal proceedings themselves.
- Section 1225(b)(2)(A) does not authorize mandatory detention of a person who entered the United States years earlier, established residence in the country, and was apprehended while living in the interior rather than actively seeking admission.
- Petitioner satisfied the requirements for a temporary restraining order because he was likely to succeed on his detention claim, continued detention would cause irreparable harm, the equities favored him, and relief served the public interest.
- Immediate release, rather than merely a bond hearing, was an appropriate and narrowly tailored remedy because Petitioner had no criminal history, had strong family ties and nearly thirty years of residence, and was not shown to be a flight risk or danger to the community.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction over Petitioner's habeas challenge to detention without a bond hearing.
- Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) authorizes mandatory detention of a noncitizen who entered without inspection decades earlier and was apprehended while residing in the interior of the United States.
- Whether Petitioner satisfied the four-factor standard for a temporary restraining order.
- Whether immediate release, rather than a bond hearing, was the narrowly tailored remedy for the alleged unlawful detention.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (17)
- Hernandez v. Sessions, 872 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 693 (2001)(followed)
- Quijada Cordoba v. Knight, 2025 WL 3228945 (D. Idaho Nov. 19, 2025)(followed)
- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 287 (2018)(followed)
- Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 501 (2006)(followed)
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)(followed)
- United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., 599 U.S. 419, 432 (2023)(followed)
- Davis v. Michigan Department of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803, 809 (1989)(followed)
- United States v. Taylor, 596 U.S. 845, 857 (2022)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…