Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Idaho grants Plaintiffs’ motion to set a reasonable bond in connection with their intended claims against Teton County law enforcement defendants. The Court sets the bond at $500 for the state-law inverse condemnation claim under Idaho Code § 6-610, while holding that the federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are not subject to the bond requirement.
Holdings
- The bond requirement of Idaho Code § 6-610 does not apply to plaintiffs' federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which may be filed without posting a bond.
- The court required a bond as a condition precedent to filing plaintiffs' inverse-condemnation claim under Article I, section 14 of the Idaho Constitution, while noting that defendants could later object to the statute's applicability.
- The appropriate bond amount is $500, payable through a written undertaking with at least two sufficient sureties.
Questions Presented
- Whether Idaho Code § 6-610 requires a bond for plaintiffs' contemplated federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
- Whether Idaho Code § 6-610 requires a bond for plaintiffs' contemplated state-law inverse-condemnation claim.
- What amount of bond should be required in light of plaintiffs' asserted indigency and the statutory purposes of the bond.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Beehler v. Fremont County, 182 P.3d 713, 718 (Idaho Ct. App. 2008)(followed)
- Urrizaga v. Twin Falls County, 106 F. App'x 546, 549 n.2 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Hyde v. Fisher, 152 P.3d 653, 658 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007)(followed)
- Clements v. Pocatello Police Department, No. 4:22-CV-00407-DCN, 2023 WL 2354894, at *1-*2 (D. Idaho Mar. 2, 2023)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…