Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas considers a renewed motion to approve an FLSA collective action settlement involving tip-pooling practices at Boyd Gaming casinos. The court approves the settlement in part, awards $196,200 in attorney fees, approves $414.60 in litigation expenses and a $1,100 service award, and evaluates the settlement using lodestar and Johnson-factor analyses.
Holdings
- The settlement was fair and reasonable and was approved for distribution to the 507 collective members.
- A fee award of 20 percent of the $981,000 common fund, or $196,200, was reasonable; the requested 25 percent award was reduced.
- The Court approved $414.60 in litigation expenses, a $1,100 service award to Perry, and $19,956 for notice and settlement administration.
Questions Presented
- Whether the proposed FLSA collective action settlement was fair and reasonable.
- Whether the requested attorney-fee award of 25 percent of the $981,000 common fund was reasonable under the Tenth Circuit's hybrid percentage-of-the-fund and lodestar approach.
- Whether the requested litigation expenses, service award, and settlement-administration costs were reasonable.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (21)
- James v. Boyd Gaming Corp., 522 F. Supp. 3d 892 (D. Kan. 2021)(applied)
- Elston v. Horizon Glob. Ams., Inc., No. 19-2070-KHV, 2020 WL 6318660, at *4, *7 (D. Kan. Oct. 28, 2020)(applied)
- Rosenbaum v. MacAllister, 64 F.3d 1439, 1445 (10th Cir. 1995)(applied)
- Gottlieb v. Barry, 43 F.3d 474, 482–83, 487–88 (10th Cir. 1994)(applied)
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717–19 (5th Cir. 1974)(applied)
- Christeson v. Amazon.com Servs., Inc., No. 18-2043-KHV, 2019 WL 4054032, at *3 (D. Kan. Aug. 28, 2019)(applied)
- Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043, 1050 (9th Cir. 2002)(applied)
- Goldberger v. Integrated Res., Inc., 209 F.3d 43, 50 (2d Cir. 2000)(applied)
- Flitton v. Primary Residential Mortg., Inc., 614 F.3d 1173, 1176 (10th Cir. 2010)(applied)
- Case v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 233, Johnson Cnty., Kan., 157 F.3d 1243, 1249–50 (10th Cir. 1998)(applied)
Showing top 10 of 21.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…