Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas dismisses Jason Robert Langford Sosa’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition with prejudice as untimely. The court finds that Sosa failed to establish extraordinary circumstances and diligence sufficient to warrant equitable tolling and denies a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- Equitable tolling was not warranted because Sosa failed to demonstrate both extraordinary circumstances beyond his control and diligent pursuit of his claims.
- The petition was dismissed with prejudice as time-barred because the federal habeas limitations period expired in August 2024 and equitable tolling did not apply.
- No certificate of appealability issued because the procedural ruling was not debatable among jurists of reason.
Questions Presented
- Whether the federal habeas petition was barred by the one-year statute of limitations.
- Whether Sosa demonstrated extraordinary circumstances and diligent pursuit sufficient to warrant equitable tolling of the federal habeas limitations period.
- Whether Sosa was entitled to a certificate of appealability after dismissal on procedural grounds.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (10)
- Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer, 425 F.3d 836, 840 (10th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Gibson v. Klinger, 232 F.3d 799, 808 (10th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Marsh v. Soares, 223 F.3d 1217, 1220 (10th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Valenzuela v. Silversmith, 699 F.3d 1199, 1207 (10th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 651-52 (2010)(distinguished)
- Lawrence v. Florida, 549 U.S. 327, 336 (2007)(followed)
- Haney v. Addison, 175 F.3d 1217, 1219-21 (10th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Navarette v. Horton, 2023 WL 1773856, at *1 (10th Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…