Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas overrules Koch Ag & Energy Solutions, LLC's motion to redact compensation information from exhibits filed in support of its summary-judgment memorandum. The Court holds that the defendant did not demonstrate a real and substantial interest sufficient to overcome the public's common-law right of access to judicial records and directs the Clerk to unseal the provisionally sealed documents.
Holdings
- A party seeking to redact or seal judicial records must articulate a real and substantial interest favoring nondisclosure that outweighs the public interest in access to records informing the court's decision-making process.
- The defendant did not meet its heavy burden to show that the asserted privacy, proprietary, and competitive interests outweighed the public interest in access to the compensation information, so the motion to redact was overruled and the documents were ordered unsealed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the defendant established a sufficiently significant, real, and substantial interest in preventing public access to employee compensation information filed as part of the materials supporting summary judgment.
- Whether the asserted employee privacy, proprietary, and competitive interests outweighed the public's common-law right of access to judicial records.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- Mann v. Boatright, 477 F.3d 1140, 1149 (10th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978)(followed)
- Crystal Grower's Corp. v. Dobbins, 616 F.2d 458, 461 (10th Cir. 1980)(followed)
- Colony Insurance Co. v. Burke, 698 F.3d 1222, 1241 (10th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard, 452 U.S. 89, 102 n.16 (1981)(followed)
- United States v. Bacon, 950 F.3d 1286, 1294 (10th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- United States v. Smith, No. 12-20066-31-KHV, 2016 WL 1312518, at *1 (D. Kan. Apr. 4, 2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…