Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas dismissed Barry Owen Steen’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition with prejudice as untimely. The court found that Steen had not established grounds for equitable tolling or the actual-innocence exception and denied a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- The petition was untimely because the federal habeas statute of limitations expired in August 2025 and Steen filed his petition on December 5, 2025.
- Equitable tolling was unavailable because Steen did not assert extraordinary circumstances warranting tolling.
- Steen could not invoke the actual-innocence gateway because he did not assert or demonstrate a colorable claim of actual innocence.
- No certificate of appealability should issue because the court's procedural ruling was not debatable among jurists of reason.
Questions Presented
- Whether Steen's § 2254 petition was untimely under the federal habeas statute of limitations.
- Whether Steen established grounds for equitable tolling of the statute of limitations.
- Whether Steen could proceed through the actual-innocence exception to the statute of limitations.
- Whether a certificate of appealability should issue after dismissal on procedural grounds.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer, 425 F.3d 836, 840 (10th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Haney v. Addison, 175 F.3d 1217, 1219-21 (10th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Navarette v. Horton, 2023 WL 1773856, at *1 (10th Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…