Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas partially grants a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging immigration detention without bond consideration. The court holds that the petitioner, who had been present in the United States for years before detention, could not be detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) and was instead entitled to detention under § 1226(a), including consideration for release on bond. Respondents must release the petitioner or provide a merits-based bond hearing by April 24, 2026.
Holdings
- Because Servin was not a newly arriving alien and had been present in the United States for years before his detention, the Government could not detain him under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A); pending a final removal decision, his detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- The Government violated the detention statutes by refusing to allow consideration of Servin's release on bond under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).
- The appropriate remedy was to require respondents either to release Servin or to ensure that he receives a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), at which his suitability for release is considered on the merits, by April 24, 2026.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Government could detain Servin under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), which mandates detention of certain arriving aliens, or instead had to proceed under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), which permits discretionary release on bond.
- Whether detention without consideration of release on bond violated the governing detention statutes.
- Whether a bond hearing or release was the appropriate remedy for the statutory violation.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Demore v. Kim, 538 U.S. 510, 517–18 (2003)(followed)
- Galdamez Orellana v. Welsh, 2026 WL 710121 (D. Kan. Mar. 13, 2026)(followed)
- Chen v. Dorneker, 2021 WL 5769354, at *2 (D. Kan. Dec. 6, 2021)(followed)
- Yajure Hurtado(mentioned)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…