Jesse Joseph Aich v. State of Kansas, et al.

Aich · United States District Court for the District of Kansas · May 18, 2026 · No. 26-3088-JWL

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Kansas dismisses Jesse Joseph Aich's pro se civil action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failing to pay the filing fee by the court-ordered deadline. The court rejects Aich's arguments concerning the filing fee, double jeopardy, and access to the courts, relying on its prior decision in a related case and the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Holdings

  1. A district court may dismiss an action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) when the plaintiff fails to comply with a court order, including when the plaintiff fails to pay a filing fee by the deadline ordered by the court.
  2. Plaintiff's arguments that the filing fee was already covered by government funds, constituted double jeopardy, or violated constitutional rights did not excuse his failure to comply with the payment order.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee by the deadline set in the court's order.
  2. Whether Plaintiff's challenges to the filing-fee requirement warranted relief from the prior order requiring payment of the fee.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (6)

  • Burghart v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 350 F. App'x 278, 279 (10th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • White v. Colo., 157 F.3d 1226, 1232-35 (10th Cir. 1998)(followed)
  • Kinnell v. Graves, 265 F.3d 1125, 1128 (10th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • Young v. U.S., 316 F. App'x 764, 771-72 (10th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962)(followed)
  • Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…