Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas denied Jesse Joseph Aich’s second motion to proceed in forma pauperis under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court maintained the deadline to pay the $405 filing fee and warned that failure to do so by April 30, 2026, would result in dismissal without prejudice.
Holdings
- Plaintiff's second motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was denied because he was subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), had not shown imminent danger of serious physical injury, and the court had previously found that his claims appeared frivolous.
- Plaintiff's constitutional objections to the filing-fee requirement did not justify in forma pauperis status because the Tenth Circuit has upheld § 1915(g) against due-process, equal-protection, and access-to-the-courts challenges.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff could proceed in forma pauperis despite being subject to the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
- Whether Plaintiff's challenge to the filing-fee requirement, including his due-process, equal-protection, and access-to-courts objections, justified granting his second in forma pauperis motion.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Burghart v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 350 F. App'x 278, 279 (10th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- White v. Colorado, 157 F.3d 1226, 1232-35 (10th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Kinnell v. Graves, 265 F.3d 1125, 1128 (10th Cir. 2001)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…