Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Kansas grants Thermo Fisher Scientific’s motion to continue the trial because defense counsel’s scheduling conflicts, an additional damages issue, and a discovery dispute support a continuance under the applicable factors. The court resets the trial for October 6, 2026, and grants plaintiff’s motion to file a response out of time while warning plaintiff about future filing deadlines.
Holdings
- The court granted the motion to continue the trial because the applicable factors, considered collectively, favored a continuance to address defense counsel's scheduling conflicts, the late-breaking damages issue, and the related discovery dispute.
- The court granted plaintiff's motion for leave to file her response out of time because defendant did not oppose it.
Questions Presented
- Whether good cause existed to continue the July 7, 2026 trial under the four-factor test governing trial continuances.
- Whether plaintiff should be permitted to file her response out of time.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Rogers v. Andrus Transp. Servs., 502 F.3d 1147, 1151 (10th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- United States v. West, 828 F.2d 1468, 1470 (10th Cir. 1987)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…