Susan N. Patrick v. Jonathan Brogan, et al.

Susan N. Patrick v. Jonathan Brogan, et al. · United States District Court for the District of Maine · May 4, 2026 · No. 2:25-cv-00048-JAW

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Maine reconsidered its stay of a sanctions-related attorney's-fee motion while the plaintiff's appeal was pending. The court lifted the stay, awarded defendants $20,133 in attorney's fees as a sanction, reduced the hourly rate for work devoted to pursuing the fee award, and denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration.

Holdings

  1. A district court retains jurisdiction during a pending merits appeal to adjudicate a sanctions-related attorney's-fee application and fix the amount of the sanction.
  2. The defendants established a reasonable lodestar fee, and the court awarded the requested attorney's fees except for a reduction in the hourly rate applied to time spent pursuing the fee award.
  3. The hourly rate for time spent pursuing the attorney's-fee award should be reduced to $100 per hour, resulting in a total award of $20,133.
  4. Patrick's motion for reconsideration was denied because she did not present a cognizable legal basis showing that the prior order was erroneous.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a district court retains jurisdiction during a pending merits appeal to adjudicate and fix the amount of attorney's fees imposed as a sanction.
  2. Whether defendants established a reasonable attorney's-fee award under the lodestar method.
  3. Whether the hourly rates for time spent pursuing the attorney's-fee award should be reduced.
  4. Whether Patrick demonstrated a cognizable basis for reconsideration of the court's prior order.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (17)

  • Roger Edwards, LLC v. Fiddes & Son, Ltd., 437 F.3d 140, 144 n.2 (1st Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 396-97 (1990)(followed)
  • Val-Land Farms, Inc. v. Third Nat'l Bank, 937 F.2d 1110, 1117 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Mary Ann Pensiero v. Lingle, 847 F.2d 90, 97 (3d Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • In re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust Litig., 187 F.R.D. 124, 129 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)(followed)
  • G.C. & K.B. Invs., Inc. v. Wilson, EDCV 00-00148-VAP (Mcx), 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26633, at *5 (C.D. Cal. May 17, 2001)(followed)
  • Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 562 (1986)(followed)
  • Hutchinson ex rel. Julien v. Patrick, 636 F.3d 1, 13 (1st Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983)(followed)
  • TD Bank, N.A. v. Estate of Woodman, No. 2:17-cv-00163-JAW, 2019 U.S.(followed)

Showing top 10 of 17.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…