Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland grants Jaquel M. Jones leave to proceed in forma pauperis but concludes that her pro se complaint alleging potential Fair Housing Act reasonable-accommodation, discrimination, and retaliation claims fails to state a claim. The court grants her 21 days to file an amended complaint and addresses several other pending motions, denying or granting them in part as specified.
Holdings
- The complaint failed to state a claim because it did not allege sufficient facts identifying the plaintiff's disability, the accommodation requested, the alleged discriminatory conduct, or the relevant events.
- A plaintiff asserting denial of a reasonable accommodation under the Fair Housing Act must show that the proposed accommodation was reasonable and necessary to afford persons with disabilities an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing.
- To state a retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C. § 3617, a plaintiff must allege protected activity, the defendant's awareness of that activity, adverse action, and a causal connection between the protected activity and adverse action.
- Because Jones proceeded pro se and potentially had cognizable claims, she was entitled to an opportunity to file an amended complaint.
- The amended complaint must contain a short and plain statement showing entitlement to relief, a request for relief, and allegations that are simple, concise, and direct; labels, conclusions, and formulaic recitations are insufficient.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint stated a cognizable claim under the Fair Housing Act for disability discrimination or denial of reasonable accommodation.
- Whether the complaint stated a cognizable Fair Housing Act retaliation claim.
- Whether the complaint satisfied the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure's pleading requirements.
- Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend because she proceeded pro se and potentially had cognizable claims.
- Whether the plaintiff's ancillary motions for filing acceptance, remote participation, reasonable accommodation, and waiver of costs should be granted.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (23)
- Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez, 140 S. Ct. 1721, 1723 (2020)(applied)
- Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)(applied)
- Weller v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 901 F.2d 387, 391 (4th Cir. 1990)(applied)
- Beaudett v. City of Hampton, 775 F.2d 1274, 1278 (4th Cir. 1985)(applied)
- Affinity Recovery Ctr., LLC v. Town Commissioners of Sudlersville, Civ. No. 23-00714-LKG, 2024 WL 149835, at *6 (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2024)(applied)
- Roberson v. Graziano, Civ. No. WDQ-09-3038, 2010 WL 2106466, at *2 (D. Md. May 21, 2010)(applied)
- Roberson v. Graziano, 411 F. App'x 583 (4th Cir. 2011)(affirmed)
- Grp. Home on Gibson Island, LLC v. Gibson Island Corp., 144 F.4th 522, 532 (4th Cir. 2025)(applied)
- Scoggins v. Lee's Crossing Homeowners Ass'n, 718 F.3d 262, 272 (4th Cir. 2013)(applied)
- Bryant Woods Inn, Inc. v. Howard Cnty., 124 F.3d 597, 603-04 (4th Cir. 1997)(applied)
Showing top 10 of 23.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…