Steven S. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Civil No. 1:24-cv-03001-AAQ (D. Md. Mar. 18, 2026) · United States District Court for the District of Maryland · March 19, 2026 · No. Civil No. 1:24-cv-03001-AAQ

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Maryland remands a Social Security disability case for further consideration. The court concludes that the Administrative Law Judge improperly discounted the claimant’s depressive symptoms based on objective medical findings and improperly relied on work history before and after the claimed closed period of disability.

Holdings

  1. The ALJ committed legal error by relying on objective medical evidence, including generally normal mental-status findings, to discount Plaintiff's subjective symptoms of depression after finding that depression was a medically determinable severe impairment.
  2. The ALJ improperly relied on Plaintiff's employment before and after the closed period to discount his allegations without explaining how that work demonstrated an ability to work during the closed period.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the ALJ improperly discounted the intensity, persistence, and limiting effects of Plaintiff's depressive symptoms by relying on objective medical findings.
  2. Whether the ALJ improperly relied on Plaintiff's work history before and after the closed period to assess his ability to work during the closed period.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (15)

  • Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Sims v. Apfel, 530 U.S. 103, 106-07 (2000)(followed)
  • Arakas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 983 F.3d 83 (4th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Shelley C. v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 61 F.4th 341 (4th Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • Walker v. Bowen, 889 F.2d 47, 49 (4th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Lonnell J. v. Bisignano, No. 24-3673-DRM, 2026 WL 693344, at *4-5 (D. Md. Mar. 12, 2026)(followed)
  • Danielle W. v. Bisignano, No. 24-3516-DRM, 2026 WL 636844, at *4 (D. Md. Mar. 6, 2026)(followed)
  • Matthew E. v. Bisignano, No. 24-2166-DRM, 2025 WL 1919995, at *5 (D. Md. July 10, 2025)(followed)
  • Charlene L. v. Saul, No. 3:19cv626 (REP), 2021 WL 725822, at *8 (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2021)(followed)
  • Adkins v. Berryhill, No. 3:17-CV-01927, 2017 WL 3781167, at *11 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 9, 2017)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…