Summary
The court holds that it, rather than the jury, must decide whether a state agency diligently prosecuted a comparable Clean Water Act action. The issue concerns the availability of civil penalties and was reserved for a bench trial after the defendants moved to bifurcate relief issues from the jury trial on the merits, without opposition from the plaintiff.
Holdings
- The court, not the jury, must determine whether a state agency diligently pursued a comparable action under the Clean Water Act because the issue concerns relief, was reserved for a bench trial, and was excluded from jury consideration through the parties' bifurcation arrangement.
- Defendants waived consideration of the diligent-prosecution issue by unopposedly moving to bifurcate relief from the jury trial and expressly requesting that relief and penalties be determined exclusively by the trial judge.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Clean Water Act diligent-prosecution bar is an issue for the jury or the court.
- Whether defendants waived jury consideration of the diligent-prosecution issue by moving to bifurcate relief and requesting that relief and penalties be determined exclusively by the trial judge.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (11)
- Tull v. United States, 481 U.S. 412, 427 (1987)(followed)
- Blackstone Headwaters Coal., Inc. v. Gallo Builders, Inc., 32 F.4th 99, 105 (1st Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Perdoni Bros. v. Concrete Sys., Inc., 35 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Lincoln v. Board of Regents, 697 F.2d 928, 934 (11th Cir.)(followed)
- Ohio Valley Env't Coal., Inc. v. Maple Coal Co., 808 F. Supp. 2d 868, 883-84 (S.D.W. Va. 2011)(considered)
- S. River Watershed All., Inc. v. DeKalb Cnty., Georgia, 484 F. Supp. 3d 1353, 1368 (N.D. Ga. 2020), aff'd, 69 F.4th 809 (11th Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Roanoke River Basin Ass'n v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC, No. 1:16CV607, 2017 WL 5654757, at *5 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2017)(considered)
- United States v. Dudley, 100 F.4th 74, 81 (1st Cir. 2024)(followed)
- United States v. Teixeira, 62 F.4th 10, 19 (1st Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Williams v. Illinois, 567 U.S. 50, 69, 132 S. Ct. 2221, 2234-35, 183 L. Ed. 2d 89 (2012)(limited)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…