Douglas Goncalves Santos and Jaderson Goncalves Da Silva v. Capital Power and Lighting, LLC, and Kevin Isabelle

Santos v. Capital Power and Lighting · United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts · January 16, 2026 · No. 1:25-cv-11674-ADB

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts addresses Plaintiffs’ amended motion for default judgment on claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Massachusetts Wage Act, and Massachusetts Fair Minimum Wage Law. The court finds Defendants liable by default for unpaid wages and overtime but reduces the requested attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest based on deficiencies in the motion and calculations. Judgment is entered for Plaintiffs in the amount of $49,948.98, with interest as provided by law.

Holdings

  1. The well-pleaded allegations established that defendants employed plaintiffs, that the work involved interstate activity, and that plaintiffs were undercompensated, including by receiving no wages for at least six weeks and no overtime premium for hours worked beyond 40 per week. Plaintiffs were therefore entitled to default judgment on their FLSA claims.
  2. Plaintiffs were entitled to default judgment on their Massachusetts Wage Act claim because they were employees, their compensation constituted wages, and defendants failed to pay the wages within the statutory period.
  3. Plaintiffs were entitled to default judgment on their claims under the Massachusetts Fair Minimum Wage Law for unpaid wages and unpaid overtime.
  4. A damages hearing was unnecessary because the plaintiffs' declarations, work-hour records, and counsel's billing and cost documentation adequately established the recoverable amounts.
  5. The court entered judgment for $49,948.98, consisting of $39,186.00 in damages, $8,966.50 in attorney's fees, $837.43 in costs, and $949.05 in prejudgment interest, with interest as provided by law.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the well-pleaded allegations established liability under the FLSA for unpaid minimum wages and overtime.
  2. Whether the allegations established liability under the Massachusetts Wage Act for nonpayment of wages.
  3. Whether the allegations established liability under the Massachusetts Fair Minimum Wage Law for unpaid wages and overtime.
  4. Whether the plaintiffs' supporting affidavits and documentation adequately established damages, attorney's fees, costs, and prejudgment interest for purposes of default judgment.
  5. What amount of damages, attorney's fees, costs, and prejudgment interest should be awarded.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (8)

  • Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Tropikgadget FZE., 146 F. Supp. 3d 270, 275 (D. Mass. 2015)(followed)
  • In re The Home Restaurants, Inc., 285 F.3d 111, 114-15 (1st Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Manning v. Bos. Med. Ctr. Corp., 725 F.3d 34, 43 (1st Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Austin v. Ken's Foods, Inc., 772 F. Supp. 3d 163, 175 (D. Mass. 2025)(followed)
  • Groden v. Epstein, No. 24-cv-10303, 2024 WL 4519724, at *3 (D. Mass. Oct. 17, 2024)(followed)
  • Carroca v. All Star Enters. & Collision Ctr., Inc., No. 12-cv-11202, 2013 WL 3496537, at *4 (D. Mass. July 10, 2013)(followed)
  • Tobin v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 553 F.3d 121, 147 (1st Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • George v. Nat'l Water Main Cleaning Co., 77 N.E.3d 858, 864-66 (Mass. 2017)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…