Damien Lashaun Nelson v. Dakota County; Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Minnesota; Dakota County Employees John Doe 1–3 and Jane Doe 1–3, whose identities are presently unknown to Plaintiff, in their individual and official capacities; Dakota County Correctional Officers John Doe 1–3 and Jane Doe 1–3; MEnd Correctional Care PLLC; and MEnd Correctional Care PLLC Employees John Doe 1–3 and Jane Doe 1–3, whose identities are presently unknown to Plaintiff, in their individual and official capacities

Nelson v. Dakota County · United States District Court for the District of Minnesota · November 25, 2025 · No. 24-cv-4662 (ECT/LIB)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota reviewed a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation after no party filed objections. The court accepted the Report and Recommendation as modified, granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss, and dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice.

Holdings

  1. Because no party objected to the Report and Recommendation, the district court reviewed it for clear error and found none.
  2. The Report and Recommendation was accepted as modified; Defendants' motion to dismiss was granted in part and denied in part; and Plaintiff's Complaint was dismissed without prejudice.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the unobjected-to Report and Recommendation contained clear error.
  2. Whether Defendants' motion to dismiss should be granted in whole or in part.
  3. Whether Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (1)

  • Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…