Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota accepted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal of Joshua Thompson’s amended complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The court denied Thompson’s applications to proceed in forma pauperis and motions to appoint counsel as moot and ordered him to pay the remaining $344.21 filing-fee balance.
Holdings
- When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court reviews the recommendation for clear error.
- The Report and Recommendation was accepted, and Thompson's amended complaint was dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
- Thompson was required to pay the unpaid balance of $344.21 of the statutory filing fee in the manner prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
Questions Presented
- What standard of review applies when a party does not object to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation?
- Whether the Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal of the amended complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim should be accepted.
- Whether Thompson was required to pay the remaining unpaid balance of the statutory filing fee.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Nur v. Olmsted Cnty., 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021)(followed)
- Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…